"The Four Biggest Mistakes A
Supervisor Can Make"
by Stephanie Goddard-Davidson
In the fifteen years I have been working in call centers (as well as in other
industries), I have been able to see first hand the mistakes most often made by
new and seasoned supervisors, managers, and others who lead employees.
Over time, I have consolidated these common errors into four major mistakes.
See if you or someone in your center is making these mistakes needlessly by
reviewing the following list:
- GIVING FEEDBACK BASED ON PERSONALITY INSTEAD OF BASED ON DATA, BEHAVIOR OR
RESULTS.
Sometimes called the "halo or horns" effect, this phenomenon is
seen when a management member tries to turn everyone on the team into a
"mini me". Certain his or her personality type or style is the best,
this supervisor offers advice, counseling, feedback and even disciplinary
action based on style or personality traits instead of on data, numbers,
observed behaviors and other objective criteria.
- FAILING TO ENSURE SOMEONE'S DIGNITY AT THE BEGINNING, DURING AND AT THE
END OF A ONE-ON-ONE.
The single most important component when giving someone corrective feedback
is to ensure that person can walk away with dignity. When two people are in
conflict or getting defensive (which is the main theme to most one-on-ones)
this becomes increasingly difficult. In an attempt to appear in charge and in
control, the supervisor may try to "win" by demeaning the employee
with veiled insults, overheard gossip about the employee, or using statements
like "everyone agrees with me".
- NOT ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY FOR EVERY RESULT PRODUCED BY THEMSELVES AND
THEIR TEAM.
Note that this mistake says "EVERY RESULT". This is a very hard
shift for many new management members. The new manager is no longer an
individual contributor, and is now responsible for every person' s
performance. This is a contradication in the "real world". No one
can control or change another. And yet, in management, you are expected to
take responsibility for your team's performance, especially when it is lacking
(and frankly, to NOT take credit when the performance is good!). The
supervisor must determine what isn't working and why and correct that; and
when things are working, he/she must continue these processes while ensuring
everyone stays challenged, motivated and recognized. Thank God for stock
options!
- NOT LEADING BY EXAMPLE.
Anyone who has had a moody boss knows that the tone of the day was set by
this person's mood. To fail to show your "best face" regardless of
the circumstances, encourages similar behavior in your employees. This
supervisor often doesn't see the correlation between his/her example and the
team's mimicking behavior. Accusations of being "unprofessional"
when employees arrive "just a little late", or when they begin to
snap at co-workers often come from this very supervisor. This inevitably leads
to a lack of trust and performance that only follows the "just enough to
not get fired" standard.
How does someone making these mistakes turn these around? By doing just
that—turn around or reverse these mistakes and make them positives. Here's
what this would look like:
- Focus on facts, not personalities.
Before talking with an
employee gather the data that supports your concerns. If your data doesn't
support your pending constructive feedback, it's time to consider that you
are judging this employee based on your own subjective criteria. This isn't
just a bad management technique, but it could land you in court. In
addition, when giving someone a "pat on the back" reinforce this
recognition with the data that earned it.
- Ensure Dignity.
Ensuring another's dignity is possibly your
biggest obligation as a management member. This may be why managers were
invented. If someone feels they are being treated unfairly or have been
wronged, it is the management member that is looked to as a corrective
liaison. Another important factor in this step, is to ensure YOUR OWN
dignity in every situation. To ensure another's dignity does not mean you
sacrifice your own values or objectives. It also does not mean that you
ignore your personal life or accept extra responsibility without a future
pay-off.
- Accept Responsibility for Results.
This is still the same
advice as with the #3 mistake above. You have got to get your "arms
around" this concept and deal with it. It is unfair and unreasonable,
but it is the reality of management. Learning to work with others,
especially those that are different from you (or that you don't like) is the
first step. Learning conflict management techniques, listening skills and
all the other "soft" skills you have no doubt heard about, are the
tools needed to accomplish this. Your parents and your school system did not
teach you these skills, so it is up to you to learn them and USE them.
- Demonstrate Your Idea of Excellence.
This is another version
of "lead by example". The difference is that it is about
demonstrating YOUR IDEA of excellence. This means that instead of mimicking
your boss or reading about leadership in a book, you decide what a leader
does and says and stick to that. Aristotle said that excellence is a choice
we make every day and is therefore not an outcome, so much as a habit.
Expect to make mistakes, but also look to remedy these errors. This is also
demonstrating excellence (which is different from being perfect).
More information on these four mistakes and how to correct them can be found in
the CCD Training workshops here. |