The Impact of E-commerce on
Workforce Management
by Daryl A. Gonos & Todd A. Cotharin
The new channels (i.e. web chat, email) into the call center are
making the job of the workforce manager even more complex. This new
consideration, layered upon sophisticated skills based routing, is creating even
greater confusion for those seeking to purchase workforce management software
and those who are trying to integrate the new channels into existing workforce
management configurations.
Letıs take a look at some of the issues surrounding tasks such
as e-mail and web chat as they relate to workforce management system vendors and
workforce managers. There have been a few announcements from the vendor
community involving strategic relationships with the providers of e-mail
management systems and the integration of the channel into the workforce
management mix. Kana and E-gain have teamed up with Blue Pumpkin. Aspect has
announced the capability as part of the Aspect SeriesFive, eWorkforce management
software into the Aspect Customer Relationship Portal. The announcements
themselves stress the importance of addressing these channels without really
discussing the methodology. This article presents what we believe are the
critical issues.
E-mail presents a different challenge to the traditional
workforce management system model on a variety of levels. There is, first, the
issue of information integration. This is a function of being able to capture
the appropriate data, by interval, associated with activityıs volume and
handling time. Technically there is no real challenge as todayıs open system
architectures present easily accessible data. The real issue here is that the
providers of e-mail servers and the like need to be educated about the data that
the workforce management systems will require for forecasting purposes. Once the
appropriate data is being captured there are a number of ways that the workforce
management system can retrieve or actively query the databases. The question is
do the providers of e-mail servers care about this? The strategic relationships
between the vendors will facilitate this, but it will take time to develop and
test. We expect more detailed announcements from Aspect, Blue Pumpkin, IEX and
others in the pretty near future.
While integration represents no significant technical challenge
the question is how much of priority is going to be placed on the issue by the
email providers and the workforce management vendors themselves. Both of these
vertical markets are having trouble staying abreast of demand for their basic
functionality so there is a fundamental lack of motivation. The real solution to
increasing the sense of urgency is a high profile client demanding the
functionality as part of a make or break deal. Then you will get some action.
This will happen, if not right away, soon.
Data acquisition is only the start, however, to the real issues
presented by the new avenues into the customer contact center. WFMG believes
that volume forecasting may be accomplished through a reasonable formula,
similar to those used to forecasts calls, for e-mail and web-chat. The
complicated part begins when you look at the service level metric (how long can
the task wait before it is completed in an acceptable time) associated with the
activity. Traditional call center service level metrics i.e. Average Speed of
Answer and Service Level (80 % within 15 seconds) will have to be fine-tuned and
new formulas applied to determine requirements.
Every business has different levels of acceptable service. The
same can be said of different activities in the center. Phone calls are
commonly addressed on demand, Voice over IP also is an on demand action, Fax
is less demanding and emails may be handled differently altogether. If you
treat an email exactly as a call, then you are in luck. Most workforce
systems, as they exist, should be able to layer this activity on top of the
calls. Logically though, emails are not handled the same as calls. Also it not
likely that there will be a dedicated group of agents to take and exclusively
process emails, faxes, etc. Multi-skilled scheduling is here to stay.
Letıs say that it would be acceptable to your customers to
return e-mails in 24 hours for standard response. The workforce management
system providers now have to layer the workload associated with emails on top
of the call volume and any other activity or channel. The differing businesses
and activities demand that the workforce providers develop a solution that
will allow for users to flexibly define the service level achievement for that
activity, with the associated media. Just as traditional calls used Erlang C
for the algorithm for requirements, new mathematical formulas must be created
for the new media.
WFMG suggests that workforce management systems address the
integration of the multiple channels into the call center at the
forecasting/requirements level. Managers should be presented with service
level goals for the different activities and the resulting requirements should
reflect the workload associated with all activities. The new skills based
algorithms then simply needs to generate the appropriate schedules based upon
the combined workload.
Another consideration is the nature of the activities
themselves in terms of how they may be processed. Some activities may be
exclusive. It is easy to imagine, though, that an agent can begin to respond
to an e-mail request, take a call or respond to a voice over IP requests and
then return to the e-mail. The data associated with the completion time of
this activity is critical for measuring, on an on-going basis, the average
handling time, associated with the event. If this data is not reported or is
corrupted, then the entire workload model is skewed, thus negatively impacting
the efficiency of the schedule.
The workforce management vendors are positioned, some better
than others, to address the impact of e-commerce by using the new algorithms
developed for the skills based scheduling dilemma. It is critical that they
integrate with the various providers to receive and store the appropriate data
for forecasting purposes and consider the impact of exclusive activities and
the processing of those activities. New service level parameters will have to
be developed and flexible approaches will have to be delivered for different
applications. It is however fundamentally the same problem that initially
presented itself to the workforce management system providers. How can we make
the most of the resources we have given the skills, availability, preferences,
seniority, productivity and service level requirements to enable call centers
to successfully deliver service? There are simply more pieces to the puzzle.